Sexpersonals and x rated dating westchester ny Camsex chatrooms
(Source: Middle East Times, 15 August, 2006) 1) The Islamic civil war Abdul Aziz Said and Jim Zanotti Washington, D. - Shortly after the recent outbreak of violence in Lebanon and Israel, Newt Gingrich made headlines by proposing that existing threats against American interests throughout the world constitute the early stages of World War III.
Gingrich may not necessarily be wrong when he points out parallels between the storms gathering today and those that preceded the first two world wars.
Irans example demonstrated that the reality of rule under theocrats was no more likely to be utopian or prosperous than in Mubaraks Egypt. Go directly after the external powers that support the autocratic regimes, instead of the regimes themselves. First, the terrorist attacks produced unprecedented images of power explosions followed by aftermath scenes of scared, disoriented Westerners unaccustomed to being on the receiving end of violence that dramatically portrayed the extremists as men of action and consequence, differentiating them from the status quo in the eyes of the masses.
Second, retaliatory responses from the United States appealed to Muslims inclination to close ranks against outsiders.
The United States failed to perceive that bin Laden was dragging it into the Islamic Civil War primarily to weaken his Civil War adversaries the pro-Western regimes and the advocates of moderation and pluralism within the region.
Had the United States recognised its own interest in prioritising the aims of bin Ladens Muslim adversaries, it could have more effectively marginalised Al Qaeda and other extremist groups by taking a supporting, not leading, role that featured a more measured combination of force and diplomacy.
The hardening of fault lines favours the extremists over the pro-Western autocrats because the broader Muslim population, lacking moderate alternatives, will invariably choose the side untainted by ties with outsiders.Please acknowledge both the original source and the Common Ground News Service (CGNews).Inside this edition 1) by Abdul Aziz Said and Jim Zanotti Abdul Aziz Said, Professor and Director of the Center for Global Peace at American University in Washington, D. and Jim Zanotti, a Research Associate of the Center for Global Peace, worry about the confrontational, fatalistic mindset that is being created when terms like WWIII are used to describe the current global situation.She then goes on to describe a half dozen peace-promoting, citizen-led initiatives that have taken place recently despite what may initially look like insurmountable obstacles: Nations are not monoliths: something large and immovable, something massive and unchanging and of uniform character and difficult to deal with on a human level (Webster Dictionary).Nations are a collection of many of us, the peaceable majority and, only a few of them, the irredeemably hateful minority. (Source: Common Ground News Service (CGNews), 22 August 2006) 4) by Maria Vamvakino Maria Vamvakino, the Federal Member for Calwell, Australia, explains why she did not support a recent bill under which all unauthorised refugees who arrive by boat to Australia would automatically be processed offshore, where they would remain in detention until a third country for resettlement was arranged.
Nevertheless, the confrontational, fatalistic mindset that this analogy is bound to produce in Americans should be avoided at all costs.