Constitutional amendment mandating a balanced budget Sex video chat with no credit card needed
for a balanced budget amendment, and some of the usual suspects among the dwindling Blue Dog Caucus have signed onto balanced budget proposals in the House, but not an inkling of support from the liberal ideologues who run the House and Senate Democrat Caucuses. Might it be that liberal congressional leaders fear that Mr.Lee's proposed amendment, if sent to the states and passed, would, in fact, seriously impede their ability to spend, borrow, and tax? Representatives and Senators are vipers, rogues, and greedy - well, not all of them, anyway. is -- a nest of vipers, rogues, and the terminally greedy. Since the 1930s, the nation has had New Deal, Fair Deal, Great Society, and Obama Society Congresses that have run roughshod over the Constitution, expanding government far beyond the founders' intent, plundering the federal treasury, pushing credit card government, and setting the stage for the looming crisis in government the nation faces today.
When it comes to government, human wiliness, and chicanery, no law -- constitutional or otherwise -- however shrewdly constructed, is foolproof. Congress of latter day Jeffersons and Madisons who legislated limited national government and budget-prudence, where is it written that subsequent Congresses, perhaps comprised of Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, and Chuck Schumer clones, won't undo the 113The argument can be advanced that virtuous voters would need to keep electing the Jeffersons and Madisons to Congress, but the Republic's history shows that very human voters don't always elect the wisest and most public-spirited to populate and helm the Congress, much less fill the presidency.
Who really trusts politicians to do the right thing rather than the self-serving thing? An argument being made by a scattering of conservatives against a constitutional amendment mandating a balanced budget is that there's no need to make any fundamental structural changes to the process of government in Washington; electing right-thinking Congressmen who respect the Constitution as is should suffice in restoring fiscal sanity and limited government. Any legislator in Washington or state capitols can attest to the challenge of mustering a simple majority to pass legislation - it's usually a tough task.
But thanks to the "living Constitution" heresy long embraced by liberal jurists, federal courts and successive Congresses have blown massive holes through the General Welfare and Commerce Clauses in the Constitution, for instance, enough to sail big government supertankers to ports across the country.
Simple legislative majorities are hard to get ordinarily but How much of Mr.
Obama's spending proposals would have hit the skids had Senator Lee's balanced budget amendment been the law? Lee's balanced budget amendment would have at least greatly complicated matters for spend-happy Democrats and Republican suckerfish.